Change this sentence to correctly include a restrictive phrase. everyone crowded around the ball player, the pitcher, who hit the winning run.
a. everyone crowded around the ball player who hit the winning run.

b. everyone crowded around the pitcher because he hit the winning run.

c. because he hit the winning run, everyone crowded around the pitcher.

d. everyone crowded around the pitcher, the ball player who hit the winning run.

As bob is driving on an exit off the freeway, he comes to a stop light and sees a homeless man asking people for spare change. “see, he’s a perfect example of why we shouldn’t be giving welfare benefits to the homeless,” bob mutters to his wife. “he’s too lazy to get a job, but he’s healthy enough to beg people for their hard-earned money all day long.” what are the sample and the target in bob’s argument? are there any inductive fallacies present in bob’s reasoning (bias, hastiness, appeal to anecdotal evidence, self-selection)? if so, explain why. if not, explain why not.