subject
Social Studies, 16.11.2019 02:31 mathbrain58

Due to the gramm-leach-bliley act of 1999
a. allowed european central banks to unite into the european union bank.
b. the us government forbid us commercial banks to own stock of foreign banks and businesses.
c. the us government allowed commercial banks to own stock and sell insurance policies.
d. the us government forbid us commercial banks to own stock of any other business domestic or foreign.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:00
What happened in georgia as a result of the supreme court ruling in brown v. board of education? question 3 options: the sibley commission was formed all public schools were desegregated the southern christian leadership was formed the general assembly passed laws to keep schools segregated.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:30
Does the amount of material present affect its intensive or extensive properties? explain.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:30
Which fundamental freedoms do citizens of both washington and the united states have in common freedom of education freedom to assemble freedom of earnings freedom of religion freedom of speech
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Due to the gramm-leach-bliley act of 1999
a. allowed european central banks to unite into the...
Questions
question
English, 02.12.2019 05:31
question
Mathematics, 02.12.2019 05:31