The data showed that every single person sitting in the front row of each of these classesreceived an "a" on the first test. the young woman was given an "f" by bothinstructors. your friends felt vindicated as the results of their work supports theirconclusion that the two professors are "out to get this young woman."the methodemployed to consider whether or not the two professors were biased against this student:
a. is an example of thinking by imitation.
b. is based on faith.
c. is an example of scientific methodology.
d. is an example of argumentative reasoning.

Option D

Explanation: In simple words, argumentative reasoning refers to the methodology under which an individual tries to reach a conclusion fro an issue by using some kind of logical and scientific study.

In the given case, the professors gave low grades to a woman and the individuals in the case made a study which suggested that there decision was biased.

Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is D.

the supreme court plays a big role in government. the constitution gives them ability to check the president and the congresses actions and dictate if their actions are allowed by the constitution or not.

hope this .

answer; broca's area;