Social Studies, 06.11.2019 04:31 Superfamicom7748

The same young woman sits in the front row of a history class, which is also attended byyour two friends. they notice in this class as well her history professor seems upset withher when she uses her cell phone beneath her desk to text. noticing that other people inthe back row are texting as well, they conclude that the professors just have it "out forthis student."your friends’ conclusion would be an example of a(n):
a. experiment
b. theory
c. hypothesis
d. observation
e. scientific law or principle

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 19:40

Why did friedrich hayek call expansionary spending dangerous? o he felt it could lower the money supply and cause deflation. o he felt it could lead to inflation and poor decisions by consumers. o he felt it could lead to deflation and poor decisions by consumers. o he felt it could lower available credit and cause a drop in prices.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00

Which of these best describes why president franklin d. roosevelt created the new deal?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30

Read the quote about government in iran. “we thought that mr. khatami’s victory was a victory for us as well. the election of a more democratic government seemed to be a bright new beginning . . but within less than a year of the election, the journalists, reformists, and intellectuals began to be persecuted by hard-liners in the judiciary and intelligence ministry . .” —camella entekhabifard, “tehran’s eternal youth,” new york times based on this quote, how does camella entekhabifard feel about the iranian government? a. she supports reforms and was disappointed when they did not come about. b. she supports hard-liners who want the supreme leader to have more power. c. she believes reformers should be silenced to keep iran's government strong. d. she supports a more democratic government but opposes freedom of speech.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30

The platt amendment of 1901 forbade cuba from entering into any treaties that would allow undue foreign involvement in cuban affairs. this law was passed after the spanish-american war to make sure that european nations weren’t going to get involved with cuba. 1, why might the platt amendment be considered ironic? 2, what reasons would the united states have for not wanting european influence in cuba?

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

The same young woman sits in the front row of a history class, which is also attended byyour two fri...

Questions