Young eli, only a bit over 18 months of age, has been fooled by his parents. in order to get him to willingly take a children's chewable vitamin every day, his parents have taught him that it is a "candy." now, whenever eli sees any product that is small and brightly colored, he says "candy! yummm" and tries to put it into his mouth. eli's attempt to make new stimuli consistent with his existing mental structures is an example of group of answer choicesa) centration
b) egocentrism
c) accommodation
d) assimilation

D) Assimilation      

Explanation: Assimilation is the method through which children tend to add the new information gained from any experience or event to the already present knowledge.

As per the situation mentioned in the question, after getting interacted with new stimuli ,Eli tends to add that experienced information to the already existing knowledge of candy structure which he has in his mind.

Other option are incorrect because centration is focusing on only aspect in any event, egocentrism does not let a person distinguish between self and others .Accommodation is the manipulation of already existing knowledge  to generate new knowledge due to new experience.Thus, the correct option is option(D).    

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

well this isn't a question but if you are asking if it is true or false it is, true.