Suppose the government removes a tax on buyers of a good and levies a tax of the same size on sellers of the good. how does this change in tax policy affect the price that buyers pay sellers for this good, the amount buyers are out of pocket (including any tax payments they make), the amount sellers receive (net of any tax payments they make), and the quantity of the good sold?

Explanation:

          It is given that the government removes a tax paid by the buyers of a good and levies a same amount of tax on the sellers of that particular good.

          This change made by the government  in tax policy increases the amount to be paid by the buyers to the sellers for the good they bought but the final amount that the buyers pay for the good remains the same.

         This is because in the initial case, the buyers pay less to the sellers and used to pay taxes to the government. The total amount or the net amount after the payment of taxes, the sellers receive also do not change. The quantity of goods that are sold also remains the same. The outcome will be same no matter who pays.

its kind of blury sorry

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.