subject
Social Studies, 29.10.2019 03:31 alexisbcatlett14

Even though the authors point to a number of situational variables that contributed to the destructive obedience of stanley milgram's participants (e. g., normative and informational conformity pressures, conflicting norms), it might still be argued that people have, lurking deep within them, sadistic tendencies that can easily be elicited by situational variables. what experimental findings by milgram call this "personal attribution" into question?
a. when participants could choose the level of shock, they administered very low levels.
b. violent prisoners administered lower shocks than non-prisoner participants.
c. there are cultural differences in the amount of shock participants administer.
d. when the learner was introduced as a minister, participants gave lower shocks.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:00
How did the romanov dynasty increase russia's power? need many details, you!
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:40
Skeleton and keyword outlines are most appropriate for what speech style? extemporaneous impromptu manuscript memorized
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:30
What are the most populous and least areas of russia and why are some areas more heavily populated than others
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:00
How does a long war with a high number of casualties generally affect civilians’ and soldiers’ opinions of their government?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Even though the authors point to a number of situational variables that contributed to the destructi...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.11.2020 20:20
question
Mathematics, 20.11.2020 20:20
question
Health, 20.11.2020 20:20
question
Mathematics, 20.11.2020 20:20
question
Mathematics, 20.11.2020 20:20
question
Mathematics, 20.11.2020 20:20
question
Mathematics, 20.11.2020 20:20