What are five examples of the differences between the jesus of history and the christ of faith?

Difference between the Jesus of History and the Christ of Faith:

Jesus of History -

People who look into the life of Jesus Christ as a normal human being like all others use the term 'Jesus of History' to address him.

According to these people, Jesus was not originally a divine figure but was decorated as one by his followers.

Jesus of History was only an influential teacher.

Godliness was bestowed upon him.

The life of the Jesus of History logically ended after he was crucified.

Christ of Faith -

Religious followers who rest their faith in Jesus Christ and believe him to be God, address him as 'Christ of Faith'.

According to these people, Christ was God himself but he chose to live among the people.

Christ was a Messiah.

People realized that he was God and started believing in him.

Jesus Christ reincarnated after the crucifixion.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: