Some investigators have concluded that the forms of logic required by piagetian tasks do not emerge spontaneously but, rather, are " "heavily influenced by training, context, and cultural conditions" primarily developed through interaction with more expert peers part of a slow but steady stagewise transition to logical thought influenced by biological age and mastered all at once

Heavily influenced by training, context and cultural conditions.

Explanation:

Jean Piaget developed a theory that explained the cognitive development of children and the different stages they go through as they grow older. According to Piaget, this development follows a steady path and it leads from one stage to the next one in children considered "normal" and the children construct his knowledge thanks to their interaction with the world by manipulating and exploring it.

However, some investigators have concluded that these different stages don't appear spontaneously but are influenced by training, context and cultural conditions. This means that the adults play an important role in the children development and they are the ones who provide children of the necessary conditions to go through the different cognition stages.

The correct answer is: "heavily influenced by training, context, and cultural conditions"

Explanation:

Jean Piaget's theory of congnitive development deals with how humans get to acquire, construct and use knowledge, and states that the early stages of life are very important as the children starts to construct ideas of his own and then contrasting them with future experiences that conflicts with the original ideas they had and that way reaching conclutions that change the way they conceived these concepts or ideas. This led to some investigators to conclude that the form of logic required by Piagetian tasks are heavily influenced by training (as i mentioned before by comparing pre-conceived ideas with future events), context and cultural conditions (because of the environment in which the subject develops).

i thought a 14 year old should know this but

colonies   were tied to britain through trade and by the way they were governed.   trade was restricted so the colonies had to rely on britain for imported goods and supplies.   there were no banks and very little money, so colonists used barter and credit to get the things they needed.  

britain also needed money to pay for its war debts.   the king and parliament believed they had the right to tax the colonies.   they decided to require several kinds of taxes from the colonists to pay for the french and indian war.   these taxes included the stamp act, passed in 1765, which required the use of special paper bearing an embossed tax stamp for all legal documents.   other laws, such as the townsend acts, passed in 1767

this mainly outraged the colonies and created what we know as today as the american revolutionary war

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.