In order to support your argument, you need to anticipate the reasons why people might disagree with you. how could you use facts to convince them you are right? if you are arguing that schools should limit criticism, which of these points would your opponents make? a) students could make others unhappy by making negative comments. b) students need to be able to point out problems so they can be fixed. c) students could disrespect the school’s leaders by criticizing them.

The correct answer is B.

Explanation:

Options A and C both point out the downsides of allowing criticism at school, so they support your initial argument that criticism should be limited. Option B, on the other hand, makes a point about why criticism should not be limited by schools, therefore it's disagreeing with you. Option B is a point your opponents would make.

Answer : B

a person who is in the opposite side will oppose what you are suggesting which is to limit critisism in schools because point B is the one which opposes that idea then it would come from an opposing side

according to classical republican political theory, which democratic republics would function best?

a.   small republics, with people who had similar interests

b.   large republics, with people who had competing interests

c.   republics made up entirely of landowners

d.   republics made up entirely of servants

idk