One afternoon, after a couple of beers, steven says that because marvin has been a neighbor, he can have a right-of-way to drive across steven's land to get to a fishing pond. two weeks later, while marvin is driving across steven's land, he hears steven yelling, "get off my property, you trespasser! " marvin has:
a. a contract that is void because trespassing is illegal.
b. no enforceable contract.
c. avoidable oral contract.
d. a valid oral contract

b. no enforceable contract.

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Marvin has no enforceable contract. When Marvin and Steven first spoke Steven stated that "he can have a right-of-way to drive across Steven's land to get to a fishing pond." This is a verbal agreement, but since neither of them recorded the agreement then it is not contractually binding and no judge will see it as so. Therefore Marvin is technically trespassing in this situation.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

answer; i believe the correct answer is (general);

acts of terrorism occur globally. the united nations global counter-terrorism strategy was created in order to build adequate systems of support and solidarity with victims of terrorism. here´s a summary of the proposed key themes: the importance of giving victims a face and a voice; protecting their dignity; giving victims legal status and defending their legal rights; providing victims with medical, psycho-social and financial support; building solidarity with victims; improving media coverage of victims; and focusing on the link between victims and counter-terrorism efforts more generally.