According to rawls, which of the following principles would be unanimously accepted by people under the veil of ignorance? inequalities in income and wealth distribution should not be justified under any condition. each person should be permitted the maximum amount of basic liberty that is compatible with a similar liberty for others. all property should be owned by the government and people should not have the freedom or right to hold personal property. people should be discriminated on the basis of cast and class. the political and economic freedom of people should be highly restricted in order to promote collective goals.

Each person should be permitted the maximum amount of basic liberty that is compatible with a similar liberty for others.

Explanation:

The "veil of ignorance" is a ethical principle that helps us think about questions of justice and fairness. The veil of ignorance asks us to imagine ourselves being born in a world where we do not know the class or social position we will enjoy. If we had to decide how that world would operate, we would most likely look for a way in which everyone enjoys relative freedom and happiness, as we run the risk of being born at any place and time period. We would not want to make decisions that benefit a group at the expense of another, for fear of ending in the disadvantaged group. A person thinking in this way would most likely permit the maximum amount of basic liberty that is compatible with a similar liberty for others.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals

answer; ///he could not explain why the continents drifted;