1. was andrew jackson a great president? opinions are mixed. what is yours? consider the words that jackson biographer james parton wrote in 1859: "andrew jackson, i am given to understand, was a patriot and a traitor. he was one of the greatest of generals, and wholly ignorant of the art of he was the most candid of men, and was capable of the profoundest a democratic autocrat [dictator]. an urbane [sophisticated] savage. an atrocious [awful] saint."

I would say "Yes"

Explanation:

Jackson become a hero for defeating the British Army at New Orleans, that is what made him such a good president, he was also a general for the United States Army and then In January of 1832, while the President was dining with friends at the White House, someone whispered to him that the Senate had rejected the nomination of Martin Van Buren as Minister to England. Jackson jumped to his feet and exclaimed, “By the Eternal! I’ll smash them!” So he did. His favorite, Van Buren, became Vice President, and succeeded to the Presidency when “Old Hickory” retired to the Hermitage, where he died in June 1845.

this headline suggests that midterm congressional   elections are at the corner and trump administration wants to activate his base by vowing to clamp down on immigrants and immigration as trump had said during his election campaign around two years ago. when a baby is born in usa, the baby becomes citizen of usa for 85 years and trump wants to end this rule of birthright citizenship to control illegal immigration and this what he said in an interview""we’re the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the united states for 85 years, with all of those benefits,” "

protectionism fosters competition and keeps price regulated is not an argument in favor of protectionism.