[w]hy not use as a criterion for income what people need to live a decent life?
and since most people's basic needs are similar there would not be an
extreme difference in income but everyone would have enough for food,
housing, medical care, education entertainment, vacations. of course
there is the traditional objection that if we don't reward people with huge
incomes society will fall apart, that progress depends on those people. a
dubious argument. where is the proof that people need huge incomes to give
them the incentive to do important things?
howard zinn

what does this mean?

whats the question huh huh bruh

since learning about his learning patterns, logan has become very aware of the thoughts and feelings he experiences as he listens to the “internal chatter” of his patterns.

answer; humanistic;

the third answer is correct (c).

the laws that regulate the financing of political campaigns seek to guarantee the smoothness of funding so that there is no abuse of electoral economic power and to avoid the capture of future politicians by the donors.

this is because donor agents have their private interests that are not necessarily the same interests of the society that elected politicians must defend.

thus, interest groups should seek their interests within the legality of lobbying practices that are regulated.