subject
Social Studies, 06.10.2019 08:00 babyquinnz

"because of our two-party system, voters often find themselves voting for the ‘lesser of two evils,’ rather than a candidate they really feel would do the best job. . "since most states distribute their electoral votes on a winner-take-all basis, the smaller party has no chance to gain support without seeming to take this support from one of the major parties. few people will support a party that never wins, especially when they are supporting that party at the possible expense of their least favorite candidate taking power
which of the following governmental policies would the author of this passage most likely support? a. preventing third-party "spoilers" from running in national electionsb. amending the constitution to ban political partiesc. reforming or elminating the electoral colleged. requiring all states to allocate electoral votes on a winner-take-all basis

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:20
Karl marx spent much of his life attempting to describe and understand how capitalism works. in one particularly vivid passage, he described in this way the turbulence he saw as inherent in capitalism: “all that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses his real condition of life and his relations with his kind.” what sort of relationships did he think his readers had with other people? a. relationships based on social bonds and solidarity b. cultural relationships c. economic relationships d. relationships of community and religion
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00
For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:00
Explain the diversity of race in latin america
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:00
What do supreme court decisions based on the first amendment usually involve?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
"because of our two-party system, voters often find themselves voting for the ‘lesser of two evils,’...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 16.10.2021 21:30
question
Mathematics, 16.10.2021 21:30
question
Mathematics, 16.10.2021 21:30
question
Mathematics, 16.10.2021 21:30
question
Mathematics, 16.10.2021 21:30