Suppose the widespread acceptance of egoism would make everyone better off. this a. would be a strong moral consideration in favor of ethical egoism. b. would not support ethical egoism. c. would be a strong consideration against ethical egoism. d. would decisively refute ethical egoism.

A. would be a strong moral consideration in favor of ethical egoism.

Explanation:

Ethical selfishness is the view that each of us must pursue our own interests, and no one has an obligation to advance anyone else's interests. In other words, ethical selfishness can be understood by the phrase "each one must take care of your own life ". It is, therefore, a normative or prescriptive theory, because it is concerned with how we should behave. In this respect, ethical selfishness is quite different from psychological selfishness, the theory that all our actions are ultimately self-interested. Psychological selfishness is a purely descriptive theory that purports to describe a basic fact about human nature.

From this we can conclude that if the broad acceptance of selfishness made everyone better, it would be a strong moral consideration in favor of ethical selfishness. Since this acceptance would make everyone focus only on their own interests, seeking improvements for themselves.

here are five steps to a strong outline:

choose your topic and establish your purpose. a lot of writers struggle to define the initial focus for their paper.

create a list of main ideas. this is the brainstorming part of the writing process.

organize your main ideas.

flush out your main points.

review and adjust.

both focus ón people who behave in a risky way and çause accídeñ both explaín how to púrchase insurance añd cover the costs of premium. both describe what happened when consumers fail to pay their premíums in time