subject
Social Studies, 01.10.2019 21:20 robert7248

Six-year-old alex likes to fix things with his dad around the house. he grabs his toy tools and sometimes even picks up a real screwdriver to try and his dad fix whatever is broken. this is best explained by theory. choose the correct answer from the following choices, and then select the submit answer button. answer choices

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:10
U.s. history i which statement is true? the missouri compromise ended slavery in the south. the compromise of 1850 eliminated slavery only in the south. the missouri compromise postponed the issue of slavery. the compromise of 1850 ended slavery in every region of the united states.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Which common characteristic of renaissance buildings does this image show
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:40
"there will be differences in degree of mood elevation seen in depressed clients after receiving either cognitive-behavioral or psychoanalytic therapy."; in this hypothesis, mood elevation is the:
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Six-year-old alex likes to fix things with his dad around the house. he grabs his toy tools and some...
Questions