In 1994, when the arizona supreme court decided the case of hernandez v. arizona board of regents, it found a duty of care to avoid providing alcohol to underage consumers. if in 2017 a plaintiff from flagstaff, arizona brings a lawsuit in an arizona state trial court against a student group at an arizona university for providing alcohol to members under the legal drinking age, will the hernandez v. arizona board of regents case serve as precedent (assuming no court has overturned it)?

Yes, it will be used as precedent and it is binding.

Explanation:

Pretenders, used in the judicial process, are the legal foundations that support a decision; These precedents constitute the essence of the legal thesis sufficient to decide a particular case. The rule in which the precedent is set is a rule, and its presentation is obligatory whenever possible.

The case of Hernandez v. Arizona Board of Regents was a case that culminated in a ban on underage drinking. Even if this case was settled years ago, it should be used as a judicial precedent in a trial involving the provision of underage alcohol sales as part of the factors that will help the court reach a conclusion on the case. case.

Yes

Explanation:

In 1994, when the Arizona Supreme Court decided the case of Hernandez v. Arizona Board of Regents, it found a duty of care to avoid providing alcohol to underage consumers. If in 2017 a plaintiff from Flagstaff, Arizona brings a lawsuit in an Arizona state trial court against a student group at an Arizona university for providing alcohol to members under the legal drinking age, the Hernandez v. Arizona Board of Regents case will serve as precedent (assuming no court has overturned it).