Is based on the assumption that if someone does something for a person, that person should do something for the other in return. think of folks in the airport who first give you a small flower-pin, and then ask for a modest donation.

Norm of reciprocity

Explanation:

According to the norm of reciprocity if a person gives us something then we should repay the person in kind. Our societies are defined by such norms and are responsible for the current structure of society. There are two types of reciprocity

Positive reciprocity

Where a positive deed is rewarded by a positive deed.

Negative reciprocity

Where a negative deed is rewarded by a negative deed.

answer; i believe that the correct answer is ( troxel v. granville);

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.