Which would most likely fall under the original jurisdiction of the supreme court?

Explanation:

According to Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in “all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls,” and in cases to which a state is party. Hence, under original jurisdiction, the Supreme Court ought to hear cases involving states or representatives of foreign nations.

The Supreme Court in the United States is an appellate body, which is authorized to hear disputes related to the American constitution, laws and treaties. It also hears disputes involving the United States, between states or between citizens of different states of the country, and in cases involving admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. Under original jurisdiction, the Supreme Court functions as a trial court.

In practice however, the Supreme Court rarely hears cases coming under the category of its original jurisdiction, as majority of the cases heard by it involves those coming under the subject of appellate jurisdiction. Under original jurisdiction, the Supreme Court generally hears cases involving two or more states of the country, as well as different citizens of different states of the country. In this context, it has generally heard and decided on cases where states have had disputes involving boundaries and water sharing. It has rarely heard cases involving officials of other nations.

Read more on -

"harry t. moore (1905-1951) – civil rights activist, leader, and the first martyr of the civil rights movement. fannie lou hamer (1917–1977) – leader in the american civil rights movement; co-founder of the national women's political caucus and freedom democratic party. james farmer (1920–1999) – congress of racial equality."

acts of terrorism occur globally. the united nations global counter-terrorism strategy was created in order to build adequate systems of support and solidarity with victims of terrorism. here´s a summary of the proposed key themes: the importance of giving victims a face and a voice; protecting their dignity; giving victims legal status and defending their legal rights; providing victims with medical, psycho-social and financial support; building solidarity with victims; improving media coverage of victims; and focusing on the link between victims and counter-terrorism efforts more generally.