Social Studies, 12.09.2019 21:30 KillerMDFK7992

In class you sit up front and act as if you are really listening by maintaining eye contact and nodding in agreement with your instructor; however, your mind is far away and not focused on the lecture. you are demonstrating pseudo-listening.
a. selective listening.
b. active listening.
c. passive listening.
d. narcissistic listening.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: kassidy49

Pseudo listening

Explanation:

Sometimes when we sit up front and act that we are really listening by maintaining eye contact and nodding in agreement with our instructor, however we actually lost in some other thoughts and we demonstrate what we call is Pseudo Listening.

Pseudo listening is pretending to listen and not listening actually. Pseudo listening can be caught easily by asking questions, merely asking the person to repeat what is has been said just now. Passive listening is listening without interrupting. That is allowing the person to complete his talk.

Answer from: Quest

To solve their problems, mesopotamians used irrigation, a way of supplying water to an area of land. to irrigate their land, they dug out large storafe basins to hold water supplies these ditches brought water to the feilds. to protect their feilds from flooding, farmers built up the banks of the tigris and euphrates.hope ths !

Answer from: Quest

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 13:30

In a complex task such as creating a website for learning, instructors may want to support the generation of multiple solutions in learners' peer feedback. anonymity may create a social context where learners feel freer to express varied ideas, and make the task of giving feedback less inhibited. however, teachers need to know just how anonymity impacts the learning dynamic in order to make informed choices about when anonymous configurations are appropriate in peer feedback. references: howard, c. d., barrett, a. f.,

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 16:00

What are the four qualities required in different relations

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:00

“obamacare”: included a provision for government-run health insurance called “the public option.” was bitterly opposed by congressional republicans because most favored a “single-payer” plan. survived two challenges to its constitutionality. was partially repealed in 2013 in order to avert a government shutdown. led to the expansion of medicaid in republican controlled states.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:20

Voters commonly condemn politicians for being insincere, but politicians often must disguise their true feelings when they make public statements. if they expressed their honest views—about, say, their party's policies—then achieving politically necessary compromises would be much more difficult. clearly, the very insincerity that people decry shows that our government is functioning well. which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines this reasoning? (a) achieving political compromises is not all that is necessary for the proper functioning of a government. (b) some political compromises are not in the best long-term interest of the government. (c) voters often judge politicians by criteria other than the sincerity with which they express their views. (d) a political party's policies could turn out to be detrimental to the functioning of a government. (e) some of the public statements made by politicians about their party's policies could in fact be sincere.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

In class you sit up front and act as if you are really listening by maintaining eye contact and nodd...

Questions