You tell your leading petty officer to have the division complete the daily work list and to report to you when it is finished. according to the leadership model developed by paul hersey and ken blanchard, what leadership style are you using?

Delegating

Explanation:

Delegating leadership style is a leadership style in which the leader of the  group transfers objectives or tasks to their staff and provides them complete  freedom to the job.

All choices and judgments are made by the staff or employees,  for which they are liable.

The answer is that you're usig the Delegating style

Explanation:

This is because, according to the leadership model made by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard, it is defined as a low-task, low-relationship. this menas, there's enough maturity on the group to leave the group working by itself and gives the freedom of taking deisions and completing tasks their own way. Even though all the styles they describe can be mixed up, this is the one that shows more concordance with the situation.

Let me know if you have any question :D

if you have ask any question and if you have got the answer reply for your position there will be option for making a brain least answer you need to click click there and they can get the points in brain list main thing is that you need to choose those answer which answer you are you think that it is to you

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.