Melvin t. smith was tried for illegal possession of a firearm. the judge ruled smith was not guilty because law enforcement failed to provide evidence about the gun's length and thus did not prove that smith's gun met the definition of a firearm. later, a witness had testified that smith's gun was a pistol, and the judge reversed and sent the possession charge to the jury. smith appealed and argued the judge's reversal of the not-guilty ruling on the possession charge violated his rights. which statement explains the constitutional provision behind smith's argument? a. individuals charged in criminal cases are protected against double jeopardy. b. individuals charged in criminal cases have the right to legal representation. c. the courts cannot force an individual to testify, or incriminate, themselves. d. the government has the right of eminent domain with just compensation.