Jeremy feels very strongly about his research topic but he can’t find sources that fit the assignment requirements and say exactly what he wants them to say. so, when he writes his annotations for his annotated bibliography, he fudges a bit by writing annotations that are closer to his views on the research topic than the views of the authors of the sources. this is,

Research misconduct

Explanation:

Research misconduct occurs when a scientific experiment containing false or insufficient information is disclosed. Deliberate alteration of any of the true data from an experiment is considered scientific fraud: improper authorship, false achievement data, false results, fabrication, plagiarism, etc. Jeremy practiced research misconduct when he manipulated the information in the bibliography by writing annotations that are closer to his views on the topic of research than to the authors of the sources.

can you explain a little further maybe give multiple choice? ?