Katie has just graduated from college and has taken an entry-level position with a business firm. she has experienced a high level of frustration in her first six months of work, as she has discovered that what she learned in college does not transfer very well to the demands and responsibilities of her job. this experience is called

Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?