To avoid the classic design mistake of “silver bullet syndrome,” the analyst should select one: a. increase the schedule to include learning time b. move proposed changes into future versions c. not switch or upgrade development tools unless there is a compelling need d. not use a design tool that appears too good to be true e. use rapid application development techniques or timeboxing

d. not use a design tool that appears too good to be true

Explanation:

Silver Bullet Syndrome defined as the belief that the next drastic change in  tools, resources or procedures will put an end to all the problems that exist within a company. According to my research on the silver bullet syndrome, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the analyst should not use a design tool that appears too good to be true. Since designs like this that provide miraculous solutions are always false or wrong.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

experiments.

surveys.

questionnaires.

interviews.

case studies.

participant and non-participant observation.

observational trials.

studies using the delphi method.

d.

thist title points out that you are explaining the nature of the u.s. government. it is the most specific. a representative government consists of a government where decisions are taken according to a voting system. the most essential aspect of a representative government is found in the different structures where voting rights are granted to different groups of people. for example, voting for governor, mayor, president, local police chief etc.