Scott believes very strongly that saccharine is an unsafe sugar substitute that may even cause cancer. even though scott is diabetic, and thus should be using sugar substitutes, he often opts for sugar-laden foods and drinks to avoid saccharine. "i'll just exercise more later; the sugar isn't a big deal. i'm really being healthier by avoiding saccharine," he thinks to himself. scott's behavior and thoughts are examples of in the face of cognitive dissonance.
a, harmonizing
b, rationalizing
c, patronizing
d, denial

b. rationalizing.

Explanation:

Scott's behavior and thoughts are examples of rationalizing in the face of cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance comes from conflicting beliefs and behaviors which produce mental discomfort. When Scott, who is diabetic, eats sugar he feels uncomfortable. He has to find a reason why eating sugar is healthier for him than saccharine. Finding a reasonable argument for doing what he really wants to do is rationalizing.

tbh idk same thing here

"choosing is refusing" means individuals face an opportunity cost with each decision they make. economists state that every decision involves trade-offs. opportunity cost is the least desirable alternative given up as a result of a decision.