Michel received written feedback from his professor on his most recent response paper. he noticed his professor left a note reminding him to avoid logical fallacies such as hasty generalizations and “slippery slope” arguments in his response papers. which sentence from michel’s paper is an example of a logical fallacy? (a) "historians have estimated that protestors involved in the boston tea party threw more than 92,000 pounds of tea into the boston harbor."(b) "the boston tea party took place on december 16, 1773 in boston, massachusetts."(c) "the violence and anger displayed by protestors in the boston tea party show that all american colonists were opposed to the british government."(d) "the boston tea party has become an iconic event in the history of the united states and is discussed in many american public school history classes."

Major automobile plants such as ford and general motors are located in columbus ohio

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.

Allow of the following ideas were regarded in the creation of the u.s. founding documents except