In the case of hamdan v. rumsfeld, the u. s. supreme court held that the were outside the president's power to create and were, therefore, invalid.

In the case of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the military comissions were outside the President's power to create and were, therefore, invalid.

Explanation:

Hamdan v. Rumsfeld is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States sustained that military commissions stablished by the Bush administration to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay lack "the power to proceed" because its structures and procedures violate both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

1. senate

2.there is no diagram

3.education