For greta harrington and her husband robert, it was love at first sight. the two were married for 52 years until cancer took her husband at the age of 84. greta is currently 83 years old, and her marriage produced three offspring: samuel, 50 years old; katherine, 45 years old; and benjamin, 40 years old. in his will, robert left all of his financial interests, a considerable sum valued at $5 million, entirely to his wife; in his will, he also expressed love and affection for his three children, as well as the desire that greta devise the remainder of the couple’s estate to their children, in equal portions, upon her death. greta has recently been “keeping company” with gary watson, a twice-divorced, 65-year-old bachelor with a reputation for “womanizing.” while visiting her mother one weekend, katherine is shocked to see a fully-executed will on the desk in the living room, devising all of her mother’s estate to gary watson. she immediately calls samuel and benjamin, schedules an emergency “sibling meeting” for sunday, and wonders what to do about her mother’s ill-advised decision. she has noticed in recent months that her mother is often forgetful, frequently calls her “sharon” (her aunt’s name,) and often confuses the days of the week. do the children have any legal rights in terms of successfully invalidating greta harrington’s will? from a legal and/or ethical standpoint, should a mother (even of adult children) be allowed to “disinherit” her offspring?

Explanation:

In this question, Greta, a mother of 3 children and the widower of Mr Robert, devising all her estate to a womanizer Gary Watson; which, by will of Robert, is to be transferred to the Children equally after the death of Greta. So Yes, children have absolutely the legal rights in invalidating Greta's will on the basis of their father's will in which he clearly told Greta to transfer the property to his children. Now from the legal and Ethical point of view, a mother should not be allowed to disinherit her offspring. The only people entitled to receive parent's property should be their children. And also Greta has developed the problem of being forgetful, the case for the children would be super easy to win, plus the reputation of the womanizer would also help children in winning the case.

the united states constitution is the supreme law of the united states. the constitution, originally comprising seven articles, delineates the national frame of government. its first three articles embody the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral congress; the executive, consisting of the president; and the judicial, consisting of the supreme court and other federal courts. articles four, five and six embody concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments, the states in relationship to the federal government, and the shared process of constitutional amendment. article seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen states to ratify it. it is regarded as the oldest written and codified national constitution in force.

many citizens are in danger of contracting a food-borne illness.

more people are living with chronic illnesses.

pathogens are becoming stronger and harder to defeat.

edge nuity