Ted, the president of a multimillion-dollar corporation, stated that he did not feel bad at all for firing thousands of workers in order to make more money. "why should i feel bad when i just made millions of dollars by getting rid of their jobs? " not only at work but also in his personal life, ted seems unconcerned with the effects of his behavior on others. to get where he is today, ted regularly exploited others and engaged in unlawful behaviors when it suited him. ted could probably be diagnosed with disorder.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.