subject
Social Studies, 02.12.2019 19:31 tylerineedhelp

The "strict constructionists" on the supreme court are generally committed to 1) the principle of judicial restraint. 2) the principle of judicial activism. 3) the idea of the constitution as a living, changing body based on the times.4) using the court to express an ideological viewpoint

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:00
Ratification of the constitution did not come easy. two groups fought over whether or not the constitution was a good government for us: the federalists and anti-federalists. if these factions existed today, which group do you think you would support? compose a paragraph explaining which group you would support. explain why you would support either group by including at least 3 examples of beliefs you support/disagree with.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:30
How was mussolini able to gain power in italy? he played to the prejudices of the italians. he fought off hitler’s attempt to annex italy. he led a coup to take over a weakened government. he proposed new ideas to solve the economic crisis.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:20
How did the kansas-nebraska act contradict the missouri compromise?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:00
What were some of the things done to the colonists by king george iii?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The "strict constructionists" on the supreme court are generally committed to 1) the principle of ju...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 13.11.2021 14:30
question
History, 13.11.2021 14:30
question
Arts, 13.11.2021 14:30