Identify each judgment below as ethical (e), or as aesthetic (a), or as legal (l) in nature, or as a matter of custom (c): that is a worthless piece of art because it says nothing and expresses nothing. options menu: question text what he did was praiseworthy because it was so selfless. we should not refer to fellow humans as "homeless" if we truly consider human life as valuable in itself, since that label equates human value with the value of brick and mortar. you ought to stand when the queen enters the room. you better pay your taxes if you wish to avoid jail-time. you better pay your taxes since fair membership in communal living requires sharing in both the benefits and the burdens of that co-existence.

Each judgement/ statement has been paired with a descriptor:

What he did was praiseworthy because it was so selfless. [Ethical: Based on the principals of "right vs. wrong]

We should not refer to fellow humans as "homeless" if we truly consider human life as valuable in itself, since that label equates human value with the value of brick and mortar. [Aesthetic: Based on a feeling of value of art, beauty, and/or taste]

You ought to stand when the Queen enters the room. [Cultural: Based on social cultural acceptability]

You better pay your taxes if you wish to avoid jail-time. [Legal: Based in law; Not paying taxes is punishable by law]

You better pay your taxes since fair membership in communal living requires sharing in both the benefits and the burdens of that co-existence. [Ethical: Based on the principals of "right vs. wrong]

is this an essay or multiple choice

no, dan should reduce his discretionary spending. not long-term goals involve more planning than short-term goals do