Write a second paragraph that explains whether you think the federal government should be allowed to use credit. remember, people debate this topic often, so there is no clear right or wrong answer. the important thing is to support your claim with facts from the lesson. include at least three reasons for your opinion.

Regarding the fact that whether or not the federal government should be allowed to use credit, given the information analyzed, it is my opinion that federal government not only should be allowed to use it but such used is already happening and with positive aspects associated. The reasons for such statement are several; first, in reports released by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) informs that federal agencies processed more than $27 billion in card purchases during the fiscal year 2007. This derived in $433 million in “merchant discount fees”.

Second, the federal government uses credit cards both in receiving payments, IRS tax payments, for instance, as well as buying goods and services using government-issued credit cards. Paying generally lower interchange fees than other merchants.

Finally, the American Bankers Association issued a statement saying federal entities that accept credit and debit cards experience more satisfied customers, guaranteed payment, and fewer losses from bad checks and cash robberies.

In conclusion, bearing the stated before it could be said that the credit system work since it improve operational efficiency, therefore, the federal government should be allowed to benefit as well from it like any other merchant across the country.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

ever since wwii tmthey always did hated each other.