Read the excerpt below justice holmes is explaining the ruling in the majority opinion for schenck versus united states. what point is holmes making about free speech and personal rights?

In the case Schenck v. United States, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote: "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."

Explanation:

1. seasonal

2. frictional unenployment

3. the number of the labor force multiplied by 100 and then subtract the number of unemployed.

4. 4%

5. an increase in prices

bro these r easy u may have to do them urself bro. lol jk the answer is two for nimber one, and for question number two sahel boi xd have fun get rekt m8