Which of the following statements is incorrect? a) there is genuine controversy over how the constitution should be read. b) the framers’ intent is clear with regard to most constitutional provisions. c) the constitution has been interpreted in various ways over the years. d) the constitution is a framework, not a blueprint.

When you are not given a specific task, you should use your time to chat. select the best answer from the choices provided t f

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Article 11 of the constitution defines the role of?