Which is the best example of a "robber baron" using his wealth in a "philanthropic" manner?

The best example of a "Robber baron" using his wealth in a "philanthropic" manner would be Cornelious Vanderbilt and how he made his wealth by accepting money from government-subsided shippers to not compete against them in his routes.

Explanation:

To understand this question we need to analyze the context of "Robber Baron" and then the context of the answer. First of all, "Robber Baron" is a term used o determine someone who has achieved wealth by committing not very legal acts, or at least just. It comes from the Raurbritter german word for the classification of the medieval german lords who charged illegal atolls in roads crossing their lands. Now, Cornelius Vanderbilt was a man who built his wealth on railroads and questionable practices. So, he matches perfectly in this association.

parable of the tares

explanation:

marginal cost is a microeconomic measure that us to evaluate the extent to which the level of production of a good is sustainable in accounting, that is, to how many quantities the company plans to profit from the production of the good.

the concept of marginal cost is simple, it means the cost of producing one more item. for example, in the case of pies, the marginal cost is the cost of producing one more pie than those that have already been produced.

it is important to understand that productive activity influences marginal cost. the marginal cost of some goods can be very high, while others may be insignificant. for example, the marginal cost of producing an extra plane is very high. already the marginal cost of a water company to provide 1l more water is derisory.

in the case of pies, the cost involves the inputs, the labor and the fixed cost, which involves the fixed space of the bakery. the level of production initially has the marginal cost decreasing because there is space and manpower available. however, to produce more you have to hire more workers and buy more inputs. if physical space is limited, workers will conflict with places, inputs and their productivity will decrease, meaning there is an optimum point of production for each level of space and manpower. from this point on, the productivity of the workers will be getting smaller because of lack of space, so that the marginal cost of producing one more pie will be increasing. so, although you have not posted the chart, but if you have the answer, you can see that my explanation goes according to the marginal cost curve that will increase from the 4th pie, answer (c).