Social Studies, 04.02.2020 09:46 Angela1998

President kennedy’s response to the construction of the berlin wall

a. proved to cuba that confronting kennedy would be an unwise move.
b. led the soviet union to believe that kennedy would back down if confronted.
c. proved to the soviet union that there was no reason to occupy east berlin.
d. led people on both sides of the wall to tear it down and end the cold war.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:00

Stephanie wants to see what percentage of her employees' total working hours are spent working overtime. in the cell, enter a formula that divides sarah's overtime hours (cell c7) by her total hours worked (cell f7)

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30

Ineed ! what is the best way to combat test anxiety? a. prepare thoroughly for the test c. picture yourself getting an a b. take deep breaths during the test d. none of these

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30

Some european explorers sailed west looking for the passage to india

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

President kennedy’s response to the construction of the berlin wall

a. proved to cuba th...

Questions