subject
Social Studies, 25.06.2019 00:30 Brad9941

One or more justices who agree with the majority's conclusions about a case, but do so for different reasons, write a(n) a. majority opinion. c. dissenting opinion. b. unanimous opinion. d. concurring opinion.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30
Which factor contributed to the rise of african empires such as ghana and mali?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:20
Which statement best describes an advantage of indirect democracy over direct democracy? a. it can make decision making more efficient b. it can citizens feel more connected to government c. it can be more responsive to citizens' interests d. it can better reflect the democratic principle of majority rule
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:00
People are willing to pay more for a diamond than for a bottle of water because
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
One or more justices who agree with the majority's conclusions about a case, but do so for different...
Questions