Match each scenario with the option chosen by the consumer. renting a home purchasing a home leasing a vehicle purchasing a vehicle a consumer gets a brand new car for half its purchase price. arrowright a pipe breaks, but the consumer doesn’t have to fix it. arrowright a consumer builds a pool in the backyard. arrowright a consumer drives a car on a cross-country road trip covering 20,000 miles. arrowright

1. renting a home - Pipe breaks, but the consumer doesn't fix it.

- When you rent a property, the problems that come with it (e.g. a pipe breaks, electricity, gas issues, etc.) will not be your responsibility, they are full responsibility of the landlord and he/she is the one in charge of fixing it. However a landlord will not cover major damages caused by the tenant.

2. purchasing a home - Consumer builds a pool in the backyard.

- When you own your home you can build, remove and fix things as you'd like, as is your property. Unlike when you rent, that you are paying for a temporary housing but its property of the landlord reason why, in a rental, is not possible to do mayor house changes.

3. leasing a vehicle - Consumer gets a brand new car for half its purchase price.

- When leasing a vehicle, the consumer gets the benefits of having a new car but not paying full price, the difference in this case is that the car is just a "rental" and it doesn't belong to the consumer. When leasing, there are many  options but miles are limited, depending on the time the lease is for.

4. purchasing a vehicle - Consumer drives a car on a cross-country road trip covering 20,000 miles.

- When the consumer owns a car there is no restraining on the number of miles that can be used on certain amount of time. The owner decides how far he/she wants to drive, and can use the car in more flexible ways.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals