20 absolutism and enlightenment read the quotation. “the [collection] of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands . . may justly be [called] the very definition of tyranny. . . . it will be proper to investigate the sense in which the [protection] of liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.” —james madison, the federalist paper no. 47 (1788) james madison was the fourth president of the united states and one of the nation’s founding fathers. which enlightenment thinker most likely influenced the ideas presented in this quotation by madison? explain what this thinker believed and how his ideas relate to the quotation.

Which statement best explains how world war ii to end the great depression? a. new job opportunities opened as the united states produced more military products. b. the u.s. army provided new jobs that paid better than any other work at the time. c. people had to worry more about war problems than about the economic crisis. d. the war caused people to trust the economy enough to spend more money.

1. describe the concept of the unitary executive. discuss whether this concept is practical.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.