What arguments did people who opposed using the atomic bomb on japan make to support their point of view? check all of the boxes that apply. japan was ready to surrender. invading japan would cost thousands of american lives the atomic bomb was a terrible weapon that would bring great death and destruction to japan. the united states had only two atomic bombs left. the firebombing of japan’s cities had already done more damage than the atomic bomb would the united states could make japan fear the atomic bomb’s power without killing anyone.

Explanation:

The use of atomic bomb on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan left the cities greatly destroyed and alot of lives were lost. this attack was carried out on these cities on the 6th and 9th of August 1945 with the approval of the United Kingdom according to the Quebec agreement.

The detonation of the atomic bombs by the U.S on Japanese cities has been the first and only time an atomic bomb has been used in an armed conflict this operation was carried out in the final year of the world war II and this led to Japan surrendering its mainland prior to the planned invasion of Japan by the allied forces. the people who opposed to the use of atomic bomb on Japan felt that Japan would have surrendered without the use of atomic bombs on their cities and also the effect of atomic bomb would be devastating as well to both civilians and the Military.

The statement that support the opposition of the atomic bomb includes:

During the war between Japan and United State, the second nuke dropped on Hiroshima which led to loss of over 75,000 people.

Aftermath the bomb dropping, some jJapanese survived but were either injured or health-wise affected by the radio-activeness of the bomb atomic properties.

A lot of argument were developed because people felt Japan were ready to surrender before the bomb dropped and that there are numerous ways that the United state could have threaten the Japanese without dropping the disastrous bomb.

Therefore, Option A, C and F is correct.

Read more about this here

link

answer; i believe the correct answer is (federalist);

apart from being against desegregation, governor of georgia eugene talmadge opposed as well to the work progress administration, an ambitious program of the "new deal" created by president franklin d. roosevelt to overcome the great depression after world war i. talmadge disagreed with welfare spending, job training and organized labor. according to his ideas, he thought the government was spending too much money on this, and he wasn't willing to accept a wage higher than georgia's lower average wage. besides, talmadge strongly opposed to the "new deal" as he thought it had communist ideas.