subject
Social Studies, 09.07.2019 03:00 brifrog13

Amendment 7: in suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the united states, than according to the rules of common law. include a definition of the part of the amendment in your own words.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:00
Agroup of anthropologists from the future want to study the culture and society of the twenty-first century. they cannot find any written documentation of this time period, so they must conduct an archaeological excavation.identify the artifacts, features, and ecofacts they will find during their fieldwork. what will these items tell the anthropologists about our culture and society?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Which statement below accurately describes the carrying capacity of any ecosystem? a. it is not affected by any abiotic or biotic resources. b. it does not affect the species of an ecosystem. c. it is completely dependent upon the food supply. d. it is affected by both abiotic and biotic resources
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:30
At what age must a person begin receiving their roth 401(k) payments?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Amendment 7: in suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, th...
Questions
question
Computers and Technology, 29.01.2021 07:50
question
Spanish, 29.01.2021 07:50
question
Mathematics, 29.01.2021 07:50
question
Mathematics, 29.01.2021 07:50