subject
Social Studies, 12.07.2019 02:30 ceceshelby646

Can pleasant aromas people work more efficiently? researchers did this study to find out. twenty-two students worked a paper-and-pencil maze six times. on three tries, they wore a mask with floral scents. on the other three tries they wore a mask with no scent. the six tries were done in random order and each used a different maze. the researchers found that the subjects took less time to complete the maze when wearing the scented mask. this study is:

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00
How is government in the united states like that of ancient athens?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:40
Aresearcher is studying women recently admitted to a state prison. all potential subjects must have children under the age of five. research subjects will be given a basket of toys to use at their children’s first visit that the children can then take home. in assessing this proposal, the irb needs to determine that the toys are: age appropriate.not an excessive incentive.educational.of high quality.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 10:30
A. the constitution goes into effect. b.samuel adams agree to support ratification of a bill of rights is added. c. virginia and new york refuses to hold conversations ratify the constitution. d. states begin holding conversations to debate ratifying the constitution.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Can pleasant aromas people work more efficiently? researchers did this study to find out. twenty-t...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.10.2019 12:43