Iwas only six months old and i was supposed to croak during the surgery. and even if i somehow survived the mini-hoover, i was supposed to suffer serious brain damage during the procedure and live the rest of my life as a vegetable. well, i obviously survived the surgery. i wouldn't be writing this if i didn't, but i have all sorts of physical problems that are directly the result of my brain damage. how does the voice affect the characterization and credibility of the text?

The voice of the passage is casual and flippant with genuine issues. It demonstrates that the storyteller doesn't end his life's obstructions too genuinely and favors rather to downplay the circumstance. With respect to believability, his saucy tone influences the peruser to ponder regardless of whether what he's adage really happened. It influences the portrayal by making it to a greater degree an entertaining story than a discouraging one. It influences the believability on account of the way that he is overstating for impact thus as I would like to think it makes the content slightly less trustworthy. On the off chance that he nearly passed on, one miracles, wouldn't he be more disturbed?

the historians cited in the article all agree with one another about the cause of the civil war. despite coming from different backgrounds and cultures, the historians agree that slavery was the root cause of the civil war. the fact that all these historiansgenerally agree with one another makes their shared viewpoints more reliable and valid, especially because the historians have different backgrounds and all work for the well-respected institutions of howard university, clemson university, and the university of colorado.

~kinetic ~potential

explanation:

kinetic and potential energies would be types of mechanical energies.