To value living an "examined life" assumes that

To value living an "examined life" assumes that "the truth lies within each of us".

In my opinion living an examined life has diverse implications for every person:  

For Cicero the examined life was an existence established in honesty and serving people in general.  

For Socrates the examined life was the achievement of shrewdness and scholarly quietude.  

For Fyodor Dostoyevsky the examined life implied the flexibility of the human spirit against malicious, torment, hardship and wretchedness.  

For Seneca the examined life was to have an important objective and endeavor to consummate one's character.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.