subject
Social Studies, 13.07.2019 18:30 antojustice

Which evidence best supports this claim? students would learn more efficiently if classrooms allowed more physical movement and flexible seating arrangements. a. studies show that open spaces spur creativity and innovation. b. classrooms are places where students should be engaged in scholarly pursuits and not talking to their peers. c. computers have been shown to aid learning in the classroom because today's students are so accustomed to using them. d. the government spends significantly more money on military affairs than it does on education?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:40
The specific department of health and human services (hhs) regulations that apply to research with children are known as: subpart b: additional protections for children involved as subjects in researchsubpart a: the common rulesubpart d: additional protections for children involved as subjects in researchsubpart c: protections for children in research
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30
What service name do you like? 1.schoolbrella 2.schoolplicity 3.studentaxle 4.studiley 5.edulliance 6.savantsnap 7.peaklemon 8.swiftgrasp 9.educaco 10.vistarise 11.iqpursuit 12.studentpivot 13.edgyadvice 14.studenterra
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
How is germany's location in europe an advantage during wwii?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which evidence best supports this claim? students would learn more efficiently if classrooms allowed...
Questions