Social Studies, 18.07.2019 01:30 gabi83

The following excerpt was added to the constitution in 1868: "all persons born or naturalized in the united states, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the united states and the state wherein they reside. no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." which of these statements does the quote above overrule?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 20:00

Choose any two countries in the world, and briefly discuss the evolution of the government of these countries.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00

Which best describes california population when it became a state in 1850? a.because of the gold rush attracting settlers all over the world california population diverse.bcalifornia had banned foreign immigrants at the start of the gold rush.so,the states population was made up of entirely of americans from other parts of the country.c california had a large african population because many southern planters had moved their enslaved africans to start large farms.d the indian removal act had led to the relocation of thousands of eastern native americans to california.as,a result the majority of californias population was native american

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:20

Identify the constitutional principle that is common in both this excerpt and federalist no. 51. based on the constitutional principle identified in part (a), explain how the perspective in this excerpt compares with the perspective in federalist no. 51. explain how the constitutional principle identified in part (a) is reflected in the constitution, including two examples to explain how it affects the u.s. political system

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:10

Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

The following excerpt was added to the constitution in 1868: "all persons born or naturalized in th...

Questions