1)how would the united states most likely encourage another nation to eliminate restrictive human rights policies? a. by imposing tariffs on the nation’s goods b. by imposing economic sanctions against the nation c. by threatening military action against the nation d. by encouraging the nation to enter into a free trade agreement answer is b allows goods and services flow more freely across the borders of the us, canada, and mexico. answer is nafta how would the united states most likely encourage another nation to eliminate restrictive human rights policies? a. by imposing tariffs on the nation’s goods b. by imposing economic sanctions against the nation c. by threatening military action against the nation d. by encouraging the nation to enter into a free trade agreement answer is b compared with protectionism, an opposing goal of economic foreign policy is a. s

Supreme court. jim, who is a bit eccentric, says that he is fed up with the way a certain employer in his town treats employees and that he is going to sue that employer in an effort to improve matters. jim also says that he is going to start his case at the appellate court level, skipping over all those "lesser" judges. jim says that those justices will surely hear him out and that he will also seek a jury. although he is not a lawyer, jim believes that the offenses of the employer are so severe that the justices will appreciate his attempt to make things better for the employees involved. will jim get a jury at the appellate court level?

The social contact theory states that

Sara and her friends were at an iowa football game in iowa city. sara is a life long resident of iowa and goes to college at dmacc. while she was in iowa city, robert smashed into her car when he ran a red light. sara was seriously injured and taken to university hospitals in iowa city (fortunately her injuries were not life threatening but laid her up for a long time and she had to drop out of college for the rest of the semester). robert is from michigan and was in iowa city to see the game and then to party later. at the time of the accident robert was drunk (at least legally - he blew a 0.17 and the limit is 0.08). sara has sustained about $500,000 in damages between her current and future medical bills, pain/suffering, lost wages, etc. also her car was totaled in the accident. can sara sue robert in a federal court? explain why or why not. (be sure to mention the two primary factors associated with suing someone in a federal court in a case like this.)