A murder has been committed and you are a juror at the trial. The prosecuting attorney has presented evidence that the victim put up a struggle and injured her assailant, drawing blood, prior to her demise. Blood typing was completed and the blood type matches the defendant's blood type. The prosecuting attorney states that this evidence is proof that the defendant is guilty of murder. As a juror, do you think the defendant is guilty of murder based on this evidence? Why or why not? If not, what other evidence do you think is needed?

it is because acrylic blanket have acrylic textile fiber

explanation:

its is better than wool blanket

i think the answer is a, hope this : )

this is an example of "committed" time.

committed time, as contracted time, takes need over essential and available time since it is seen as profitable work. it alludes to the time allotted to keep up a home and family. at the point when a man is commuting using committed time this individual may feel that the drive is an obligation to family, for example, strolling youngsters to class or driving a mate to work. contracted and committed time clients may feel that their commute could really compare to the commute of important or leisure time clients on the grounds that their commute is profitable work. in this manner, they might be more disposed to pick a mechanized method of movement.  

a sonic boom is a loud boom that breaks the sound barrier

explanation: